balancing traditional and contemporary values
The region has become the subject of a heated debate over” Asian values” as a result of Asian countries ‘ economic successes, which are frequently achieved using quite different methods than those of the West. The alleged unity of Eastern economic models https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20221129-the-trust-crisis-facing-women-leaders, social ideals and social practices, and the role of historical factors in East Asia’s emergence as an intercontinental power have been the main topics of discussion in this discussion.
One invariable answer to these criticisms has been an East korean women Asians ‘ angry defensiveness. The characterizations of their societies that have emerged in the process are never flattering: they are said to be self- reliant, already apparently universalist, centered on personal relationships and mutual obligation more than cold letter of the law – even though the latter is called upon to enforce those values, respectful of hierarchy and authority, and state interventionist, sometimes into the private space of individuals.
This defensiveness is a natural reaction to the fact that the affected societies are experiencing an unprecedented level of change as a result of globalization forces. The heart of this discussion is, however, the way in which these societies are attempting to create norms of governance and social organization that will be viewed as legitimate by their citizens.
This is being done at the local level, in public forums, in local government, and in their respective social and religious institutions. According to my informal poll of respondents in 1994 and 1996, the emphasis that the majority of Asians place on maintaining an organized society even at the expense of some individual freedoms is a good idea.